Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40740966›Full record

ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2025

Parallel Phase II Clinical Trials of Selinexor in Patients With Advanced Thymoma and Thymic Carcinoma.

Chul Kim, Vanya Aggarwal, Gedske Daugaard, Tianzhi Tang, Jaeil Ahn, Benjamin Besse, Nicolas Girard, Giuseppe Giaccone, Peter Meidahl Petersen

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03193437 phase2terminatednot on this map

A Phase 2, Open-label Study of Selinexor (KPT-330) in Patients With Advanced Thymic Epithelial Tumor (TET) Progressing After Primary Chemotherapy (SELECT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeorgetown UniversityRan2018 to 2022Enrolled8ConditionsThymoma, Advanced Thymic Epithelial TumorArmsOpen Label Selinexor
NCT03466827 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

A Phase II Study of Selinexor (KPT-330) in Patients With Advanced Thymic Epithelial Tumour (TET) Progressing After Primary Chemotherapy.

TypeinterventionalSponsorMorten Mau-SoerensenRan2017 to 2020Enrolled25ConditionsThymoma, Advanced Thymic Epithelial TumourArmsSelinexor
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chul KimGeorgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia.
Vanya AggarwalGeorgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia.
Gedske DaugaardDepartment of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tianzhi TangGeorgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia.
Jaeil AhnDepartment of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia.
Benjamin BesseParis-Saclay University, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, Paris, France.
Nicolas GirardDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Giuseppe GiacconeWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Peter Meidahl PetersenDepartment of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHEN W BYERS · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are rare and include thymomas (T) and thymic carcinomas (TC). Effective treatment options are needed for patients with progressive disease after platinum-based chemotherapy. Preclinical studies demonstrated antitumor activity of selinexor, an inhibitor of the nuclear receptor exportin-1 (XPO1/CRM1), supporting the clinical development of XPO1-targeted therapy for the treatment of TETs. To further assess the safety and efficacy of selinexor in TETs, we conducted two coordinated parallel phase II clinical trials. Methods: This report includes two nearly identical phase II trials, designed to run in parallel, conducted in the United States (NCT03193437) and Europe (Denmark and France; NCT03466827). Analysis was performed on data pooled from both trials. Both trials were nonrandomized, open-label, two-armed phase II trials (arm A: thymoma, arm B: thymic carcinoma) with the same study design. Patients with histologically confirmed, advanced, inoperable TETs who had progressive disease after treatment with at least one platinum-containing chemotherapy regimen were included. In each 4-week cycle, patients received selinexor 60 mg twice weekly for 3 weeks. To improve tolerability, the starting dose was reduced to 40 mg twice weekly during the study. The primary objective was overall response rate (ORR) assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1, with secondary objectives including progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) assessed per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event version 4.03. Results: A total of 31 patients were enrolled between the two trials: 16 with T and 15 with TC. The median age was 57 (range: 41-81) years, with 17 men and 14 women. The median number of previous systemic therapies was 2 (range: 1-9). The starting dose was 60 mg twice weekly for 29 patients (93.5%) and 40 mg twice weekly for two patients (6.5%). There was one complete response in the TC group (ORR 6.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2%-29.8%) and two partial responses (ORR 12.5%; 95% CI: 3.5%-36.0%) in the T group. Stable disease as the best response was observed in 11 patients (68.6%) with T and 12 patients (80%) with TC. The median duration of selinexor therapy was 4.5 (range: 0.1-44.3) months. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were nausea (83.8%), vomiting (45.2%), anemia (41.9%), fatigue (38.7%), and asthenia (38.7%). The most common grade 3 or higher TRAEs were anemia (16.1%), thrombocytopenia (12.9%), and asthenia (12.9%). Furthermore, 20 patients (64.5%) required dose reductions due to AEs and 20 patients (64.5%) required dose interruptions. In the T group, the median PFS was 13.6 months (95% CI: 6.3-44.3), and the median OS was not reached. In the TC group, the median PFS was 7.8 months (95% CI: 4.3-15.5) and the median OS was 15.5 months (95% CI: 13.0-29.9). The trials were halted prematurely due to overall low ORRs and budgetary constraints. Conclusion: Selinexor demonstrated modest anticancer activity in patients with pretreated advanced TETs. The treatment was complicated by high rates of TRAEs, leading to frequent dose reductions and interruptions.

Indexed as

SelinexorTargeted therapyThymic carcinomaThymic epithelial tumorsThymoma

Identifiers

PMID40740966
PMCPMC12304669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.