ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025
Challenges and prospects in mentoring medical scientists in Latin America: a narrative review and recommendations.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI literacy among healthcare professionals and students in the Americas.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Review
- Hepatitis B Research in Peru, 1988-2023: Geographic Inequities, Thematic Gaps, and Misalignment with Disease Burden.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Invest where impact begins: recommendations from Breast Cancer Research Foundation Early Career Investigator Working Group (Part 1 of 2).NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To identify the challenges for the development and mentorship of physician-scientists in Latin America, outline the key barriers to integrating research training into medical education and post-graduate pathways, and propose recommendations to foster structured mentorship, improve institutional support, and strengthen the research ecosystem for future physician-scientists. Study design: Narrative review. Methods: A narrative review of relevant literature, institutional reports, and existing educational models was undertaken. The authors synthesized information on current educational pathways, funding opportunities, institutional infrastructures, and mentorship practices for physician-scientists in Latin America and derived practical recommendations for improving mentorship and training structures. Results: Latin America's aspiring physician-scientists face fragmented educational programs, limited or inconsistent research integration in medical curricula, and inadequate mentorship support. These issues are exacerbated by overburdened healthcare systems, insufficient funding, low stipends, and a scarcity of dual-degree training programs. Institutional and funding barriers frequently force trainees and established researchers to choose between clinical practice and research, stifling the growth of a skilled physician-scientist workforce. Proposed solutions include developing integrated dual-degree and research residency programs, reforming medical curricula to include foundational research skills, strengthening mentorship networks through structured support and incentives, increasing research fellowship funding and removing exclusivity clauses, and creating regional consortia to standardize training and foster cross-border collaboration. Conclusion: Addressing the systemic barriers to mentoring and training physician-scientists in Latin America is essential for building a robust, research-oriented medical community. The recommended structural reforms, with increasing funding, enhanced mentorship frameworks, and promoting regional partnerships, can help Latin America cultivate a sustainable environment for the development of physician-scientists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.