Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40740933›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2025

Proton beam therapy for esophageal cancer compared to existing treatments, including X-ray therapy and surgery.

Takashi Ono, Masashi Koto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Takashi OnoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Yamagata 990-9585, Japan.
Masashi KotoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Yamagata 990-9585, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Esophageal cancer is one of the most difficult cancers to treat since it is often at an advanced stage at the time of symptom presentation. For locally advanced esophageal cancer, treatment options include multidisciplinary treatment such as surgery or definitive chemoradiotherapy. Surgery has a high local control rate because it involves excision of the cancer along with the surrounding organs; however, it is still highly invasive, although advances in surgery have reduced the burden on patients. On the other hand, chemoradiotherapy may also be applicable in cases in which surgery is inoperable owing to complications or distant lymph node metastasis. However, chemoradiotherapy using X-ray irradiation can cause late toxicities, including those to the heart. Proton beam therapy is widely used to treat esophageal cancer because of its characteristics, and some comparisons between proton beam therapy and X-ray therapy or surgery have recently been reported. This review discusses the role of proton beam therapy in esophageal cancer in comparison to X-ray therapy and surgery.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyDose volume histogramEsophageal neoplasmsEsophagectomyPrognosisProton beam therapyQuality of lifeToxicityX-ray therapy

Identifiers

PMID40740933
PMCPMC12305267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.