ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2025
Application of a glasses-free 3D laparoscopic system in radical gastrointestinal cancer surgery.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Glasses-free three-dimensional laparoscopic systems in oncologic surgery: Innovation or equivalence?World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe clinical application of autostereoscopic (glass-free) 3D laparoscopic systems in the radical resection of gastrointestinal malignancies remains to be fully evaluated.
aimTo compare the surgical outcomes and short-term postoperative complications between autostereoscopic (glass-free) 3D and glasses-based 3D laparoscopic systems in patients undergoing radical resection for gastric and colorectal malignancies.
methodsThis retrospective study involved 165 patients (99 males, 66 females; median age: 63 years; range: 28-86 years) who underwent laparoscopic radical resection for gastrointestinal malignancies between October 2022 and May 2023. Patients were divided into naked-eye 3D groups (gastric cancer:
resultsFor gastric cancer patients, no significant differences in operation time [195 (169, 214) minutes
conclusionPreliminary evidence suggests that the autostereoscopic 3D laparoscopic system achieves comparable surgical outcomes to those of conventional glasses-based systems in the radical resection of gastrointestinal malignancies. Further large-scale studies are needed to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.