ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2025
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related adverse events: What is the role of surgery today?
Review in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Initial non-surgical versus upfront surgical management of ERCP-related perforations by Stapfer type: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Prevention and Management of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography-Related Perforation: A Guideline-Based Narrative Review.Gut and liver · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) plays a vital role in managing biliary and pancreatic diseases but carries a risk of severe complications that may require surgical intervention. This review focuses on the surgical management of key ERCP-related complications: Post-sphincterotomy bleeding, perforations, stent migration-induced perforations, and Dormia basket impaction. Although many complications can be managed endoscopically, surgery remains essential in refractory cases or when less invasive methods fail. Post-sphincterotomy bleeding, although often controlled endoscopically, may necessitate surgical ligation when hemorrhage persists. Perforations, classified by anatomical type, require tailored surgical approaches - primary repair for type I and biliary diversion with defect closure for types II and III. Stent migration-induced perforations, which may lead to peritonitis or abscess formation, often require surgery due to their variable clinical presentation and the lack of standardized management guidelines. Dormia basket impaction, although rare, may require advanced endoscopic techniques or laparoscopic retrieval if conservative measures prove ineffective. Early recognition, multidisciplinary collaboration, and individualized treatment strategies are pivotal in reducing morbidity and mortality. This review underscores evolving surgical approaches, emphasizing the importance of timely, patient-specific decisions to improve outcomes in severe ERCP-related complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.