ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2025
Application and challenges of artificial intelligence in predicting perioperative complications of colorectal cancer.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a prevalent malignancy, with surgery playing a key role in its treatment. However, perioperative complications, such as anastomotic leaks, infections, and mortality, can significantly affect surgical outcomes, extend hospital stays, and increase healthcare costs. Traditional risk prediction models often lack precision, leading to increased interest in artificial intelligence (AI) for improving risk stratification. This review examines the application of AI, particularly machine learning and deep learning, in predicting perioperative complications in CRC surgery. AI models have been employed to predict a variety of postoperative complications, including readmissions, surgical-site infections, anastomotic leakage, and mortality, by analyzing diverse data sources such as electronic health records, medical imaging, and preoperative markers. Despite the promising results, several challenges remain, including data quality, model generalizability, the complexity of clinical data, and ethical and regulatory concerns. The review emphasizes the need for multicenter, diverse datasets and the integration of AI into clinical workflows to improve model performance and adoption. Future efforts should focus on enhancing the transparency and interpretability of AI models to ensure their successful implementation in clinical practice, ultimately improving patient outcomes and surgical decision-making in CRC surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.