Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40740901›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2025

Application and challenges of artificial intelligence in predicting perioperative complications of colorectal cancer.

Yang-Yang Fu, Yan Jiao, Ya-Hui Liu, Shan-Shan Dong

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yang-Yang FuDepartment of the First Operation Room, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130000, Jilin Province, China.
Yan JiaoDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, General Surgery Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, Jilin Province, China.
Ya-Hui LiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, General Surgery Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, Jilin Province, China. yahui@jlu.edu.cn.
Shan-Shan DongDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130022, Jilin Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a prevalent malignancy, with surgery playing a key role in its treatment. However, perioperative complications, such as anastomotic leaks, infections, and mortality, can significantly affect surgical outcomes, extend hospital stays, and increase healthcare costs. Traditional risk prediction models often lack precision, leading to increased interest in artificial intelligence (AI) for improving risk stratification. This review examines the application of AI, particularly machine learning and deep learning, in predicting perioperative complications in CRC surgery. AI models have been employed to predict a variety of postoperative complications, including readmissions, surgical-site infections, anastomotic leakage, and mortality, by analyzing diverse data sources such as electronic health records, medical imaging, and preoperative markers. Despite the promising results, several challenges remain, including data quality, model generalizability, the complexity of clinical data, and ethical and regulatory concerns. The review emphasizes the need for multicenter, diverse datasets and the integration of AI into clinical workflows to improve model performance and adoption. Future efforts should focus on enhancing the transparency and interpretability of AI models to ensure their successful implementation in clinical practice, ultimately improving patient outcomes and surgical decision-making in CRC surgery.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceColorectal cancerMachine learningPerioperative complicationsPredictive models

Identifiers

PMID40740901
PMCPMC12305258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.