ArticleIEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine2025
Multimodal AI for Home Wound Patient Referral Decisions From Images With Specialist Annotations.
Article in IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Wound Images and Clinical Text for Pressure Injury Assessment and Treatment Recommendation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Research Progress on Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic wounds affect 8.5 million Americans, especially the elderly and patients with diabetes. As regular care is critical for proper healing, many patients receive care in their homes from visiting nurses and caregivers with variable wound expertise. Problematic, non-healing wounds should be referred to experts in wound clinics to avoid adverse outcomes such as limb amputations. Unfortunately, due to the lack of wound expertise, referral decisions made in non-clinical settings can be erroneous, delayed or unnecessary. This paper proposes the Deep Multimodal Wound Assessment Tool (DM-WAT), a novel machine learning framework to support visiting nurses by recommending wound referral decisions from smartphone-captured wound images and associated clinical notes. DM-WAT extracts visual features from wound images using DeiT-Base-Distilled, a Vision Transformer (ViT) architecture. Distillation-based training facilitates representation learning and knowledge transfer from a larger teacher model to DeiT-Base, enabling robust performance on our small wound image dataset of 205 wound images. DM-WAT extracts text features from clinical notes using DeBERTa-base, which comprehends context by disentangling content and position information from clinical notes. Visual and text features are combined using an intermediate fusion approach. To overcome the challenges posed by a small and imbalanced dataset, DM-WAT integrates image and text augmentation along with transfer learning via pre-trained feature extractors to achieve high performance. In rigorous evaluation, DM-WAT achieved an accuracy of 77% [Formula: see text]% and an F1 score of 70% [Formula: see text]%, outperforming the prior state of the art and all baseline single-modality and multimodal approaches. Additionally, to interpret DM-WAT's recommendations, the Score-CAM and Captum interpretation algorithms provided insights into the specific parts of the image and text inputs that the model focused on during decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.