ReviewEcology and evolution2025
Pheasants 365: A Review of Seasonal Ring-Necked Pheasant Habitat in Central North America.
Review in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Spatial Analysis of Common Pheasant (Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Pheasants 365: A Review of Seasonal Ring-Necked Pheasant Habitat in Central North America.Ecology and evolution · 2025Review
- Remote Sensing and Landcover in Ring-Necked Pheasant Research: A Review of Data Sources and Scales.Ecology and evolution · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ring-necked pheasants, an economically important game species in North America, are facing population declines in agriculturally dominated areas due to the intensification of production systems. There is a significant body of research on pheasant habitat requirements, much of which aims to address declines by guiding management decisions to improve habitat conditions. Pheasants, like many species, have differing resource needs throughout the year based on their life history and seasonal changes to the landscape; however, many studies have only focused on one or two of the three key ecological seasons-breeding, brood-rearing, or overwintering. We conducted a literature review using the Web of Science database to synthesize results from studies investigating pheasant habitat in central North America in a seasonal context in order to provide a year-round perspective on pheasant habitat management. Our results show the importance of grasslands and small grains during the nesting and brood-rearing seasons, while wetlands and food plots become important during the winter months. Grassland structure is a crucial component of nesting habitat, with pheasants selecting for greater litter content and visual obstruction for nesting in 90% of studies that included those variables, while during brood-rearing, chicks had higher success in grasslands with a higher percentage of forbs interspersed with bare ground. No consistent relationship was found with woodlands during any season, positive or negative. Pheasant relationships with row crops showed mixed results during nesting and brood-rearing, as they are frequently used but not preferred. During the winter, row crops and other agricultural lands such as pasture and hay fields were negatively related to pheasant resource use, abundance, and/or survival. This review aims to guide management decisions throughout the entire year for pheasant habitat by providing a season-specific synthesis of the literature within the Great Plains and Midwestern USA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.