Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40740794›Full record

ReviewEcology and evolution2025

Pheasants 365: A Review of Seasonal Ring-Necked Pheasant Habitat in Central North America.

Allison J Barg, Megan Baldissara, Daniel R Uden, John P Carroll, Andrew Little

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Spatial Analysis of Common Pheasant (Ecology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Allison J BargSchool of Natural Resources University of Nebraska-Lincoln Lincoln Nebraska USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8448-3414
Megan BaldissaraSchool of Natural Resources University of Nebraska-Lincoln Lincoln Nebraska USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2097-7154
Daniel R UdenSchool of Natural Resources, Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, Center for Resilience in Agricultural Working Landscapes University of Nebraska-Lincoln Lincoln Nebraska USA.
John P CarrollSchool of Natural Resources University of Nebraska-Lincoln Lincoln Nebraska USA.
Andrew LittleSchool of Natural Resources University of Nebraska-Lincoln Lincoln Nebraska USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ring-necked pheasants, an economically important game species in North America, are facing population declines in agriculturally dominated areas due to the intensification of production systems. There is a significant body of research on pheasant habitat requirements, much of which aims to address declines by guiding management decisions to improve habitat conditions. Pheasants, like many species, have differing resource needs throughout the year based on their life history and seasonal changes to the landscape; however, many studies have only focused on one or two of the three key ecological seasons-breeding, brood-rearing, or overwintering. We conducted a literature review using the Web of Science database to synthesize results from studies investigating pheasant habitat in central North America in a seasonal context in order to provide a year-round perspective on pheasant habitat management. Our results show the importance of grasslands and small grains during the nesting and brood-rearing seasons, while wetlands and food plots become important during the winter months. Grassland structure is a crucial component of nesting habitat, with pheasants selecting for greater litter content and visual obstruction for nesting in 90% of studies that included those variables, while during brood-rearing, chicks had higher success in grasslands with a higher percentage of forbs interspersed with bare ground. No consistent relationship was found with woodlands during any season, positive or negative. Pheasant relationships with row crops showed mixed results during nesting and brood-rearing, as they are frequently used but not preferred. During the winter, row crops and other agricultural lands such as pasture and hay fields were negatively related to pheasant resource use, abundance, and/or survival. This review aims to guide management decisions throughout the entire year for pheasant habitat by providing a season-specific synthesis of the literature within the Great Plains and Midwestern USA.

Indexed as

agricultural landscapesavian ecologygame birdgrassland conservationhabitat managementPhasianus colcichus

Identifiers

PMID40740794
PMCPMC12310294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.