Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40740782›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025

Factors determining the outcomes of immune imprinting after repeated orthoflavivirus infections.

Gielenny M Salem, Fan-Chi Chen, James J Cai, Day-Yu Chao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gielenny M SalemInfection Biology Program, Global Center for Pathogen Research and Human Health, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Fan-Chi ChenDoctoral Program in Microbial Genomics, National Chung Hsing University and Academia Sinica, Taichung City, Taiwan.
James J CaiDepartment of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Day-Yu ChaoDoctoral Program in Microbial Genomics, National Chung Hsing University and Academia Sinica, Taichung City, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orthoflaviviruses, a group of arthropod-borne viruses, represent a significant global health threat, with hundreds of millions of infections each year, often leading to severe clinical outcomes. This Review elucidates the complexities of immune imprinting, also known as original antigenic sin (OAS), and its influence on immune responses to repeated, heterologous orthoflavivirus infections. We examine how initial exposure to a virus can shape subsequent immune responses, potentially resulting in sub-optimal binding of pre-existing antibodies to related but distinct viruses. Although OAS is often linked with adverse outcomes, such as enhanced disease severity in dengue due to antibody-dependent enhancement, we re-introduce the concept of "antigenic seniority," which highlights the potential advantages of prior exposures by promoting cross-protection against related variants. This perspective underscores the dual nature of immune imprinting and its implications for vaccine development and therapeutic strategies against orthoflavivirus infections. By exploring the delicate balance between protective and maladaptive immune responses, we emphasize critical considerations for developing effective vaccines and interventions in the context of evolving viral threats.

Indexed as

FlaviviridaeFlaviviridae InfectionsAnimalsAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralCross ProtectionHumansViral VaccinesAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralViral Vaccinesantibody-dependent enhancement (ADE)antigenic seniorityimmune imprintingoriginal antigenic sin (OAS)orthoflaviviruses

Identifiers

PMID40740782
PMCPMC12307404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.