ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
PET/CT-Based prognostic model enhances early survival prediction in angioimmunoblastic t-cell lymphoma.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To develop and validate a new prognostic model using baseline PET parameters and clinical indicators for predicting early overall survival (OS) in Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study from December 2009 to December 2023 (n=124) at a single center. The model's predictors included baseline clinical characteristics, pathological indicators, laboratory metrics, and PET/CT parameters. Independent prognostic factors were identified using Cox regression and presented as nomograms. The C-index assessed predictive accuracy, while calibration plots and decision curve analysis evaluated prediction accuracy and discrimination ability. The model's accuracy was compared with existing prognostic systems using C-index, NRI, ROC, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Results: SUVmax, β2MG, platelet, and albumin were identified as independent risk factors. The C-index for OS was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.70-0.85); for 1000 bootstrap samples, it was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.61-0.93). Calibration curves showed excellent agreement between predictions and actual observations. The AUC for 6-month and 1-year OS were 0.91(95% CI: 0.82-1.00) and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.77-0.94), respectively. The model outperformed PIAI, IPI, and PIT in predictive capacity. Conclusion: The new prediction model reliably estimates outcomes for AITL patients, demonstrating high discrimination and calibration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.