Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40740758›Full record

ArticleJournal of the anus, rectum and colon2025

Pure Well-differentiated Adenocarcinoma as a Safe Factor for Lymph Node Metastasis and Recurrence of T1 Colorectal Cancer.

Ken Inoue, Naohisa Yoshida, Reo Kobayashi, Ryohei Hirose, Naoto Iwai, Osamu Dohi, Takaaki Murakami, Yutaka Inada, Tomohiro Arita, Yukiko Morinaga and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the anus, rectum and colon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ken InoueMolecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Naohisa YoshidaMolecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Reo KobayashiMolecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Ryohei HiroseDepartment of Infectious Disease, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Naoto IwaiMolecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Osamu DohiMolecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Takaaki MurakamiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Aiseikai Yamashina Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Yutaka InadaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Japanese Red Cross Society Kyoto Daiichi Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Tomohiro AritaDepartment of Surgery, Division of Digestive Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Yukiko MorinagaDepartment of Surgical Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Eiichi KonishiDepartment of Surgical Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Yoshito ItohDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Saiseikai Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Pure well-differentiated adenocarcinoma (PWDA) could be a safe factor against lymph node metastasis (LNM) and recurrence in patients with T1 colorectal cancer. We investigated the utility and endoscopic features of PWDA to determine its predictive ability. Methods: We analyzed the LNM and recurrence rates, along with various clinicopathological factors, including PWDA, in 315 patients with T1 colorectal cancer who underwent surgical resection at our center. PWDA was defined as a lesion consisting of well-differentiated adenocarcinoma only. Three pathologists evaluated the consistency of the PWDA diagnosis and performed inter- and intraobserver assessments of PWDA and lymphatic invasion. Endoscopic features of PWDA was also examined. Results: The LNM, recurrence, and PWDA rates in patients with T1 colorectal cancer were 9.5%, 2.9%, and 31.1%, respectively. Significant differences were observed in T1b (100% vs. 82.8%; p = 0.014) and non-PWDA (100% vs. 65.6%; p < 0.001) between patients with and without LNM. Multivariate analyses showed that non-PWDA was an independent risk factor for LNM (odds ratio [OR], 12.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.59-92.0; p = 0.016). Furthermore, significant differences in venous invasion (44.4% vs. 19.6%; p < 0.001), and non-PWDA (100% vs. 68.0%; p < 0.001) were observed between patients with and without recurrence. The agreement among three pathologists on the diagnosis of PWDA was acceptable (kappa value > 0.5). Surface redness (p < 0.001), a rugged surface (p < 0.01), fold convergence (p < 0.001), and an impression of fullness (p = 0.031) were significantly related with PWDA. Conclusions: PWDA can predict safety against LNM and recurrence in patients with T1 colorectal cancer.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerlymph node metastasispure well-differentiated adenocarcinomarecurrence

Identifiers

PMID40740758
PMCPMC12307019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.