ArticleUS cardiology2025
'Inverted Tulip': New Deformation of Atrial Septal Defect Closure Devices.
Article in US cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present the case of a 45-year-old woman (62 kg, 160 cm) who suffered an ischemic stroke associated with patent foramen ovale (PFO) with high-risk anatomical features. The defect was percutaneously closed using a LifeTech CeraFlex PFO 30 mm × 25 mm device deployed via a 12 Fr sheath after multiple implantation attempts. Following release, the right atrial disc exhibited a concave deformation, termed the 'inverted tulip,' which prolonged the procedure and resulted in a significant residual shunt. The shunt resolved spontaneously at the 1-month echocardiographic follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.