ArticleRoyal Society open science2025
A method and system for generating a combination of psychological testing scales.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A method and system for generating a combination of psychological testing scales.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Given the inherent limitations of traditional psychological testing scales in terms of breadth and specificity, both comprehensive and individual assessment scales offer distinct advantages. However, challenges persist because of their complementary deficiencies in practical applications. This article argues that intricate content optimization of scales is not necessary; instead, it conceptualizes comprehensive scales and individual assessment items as a multi-label classification problem. By employing a hierarchical framework, it becomes possible to achieve overall optimization of psychological testing scales. To this end, the paper introduces an algorithm designed to generate combinations of psychological scales, optimizing both comprehensive and individual assessments. This optimization is realized through a series of methodological steps, including the analysis of historical positive diagnosis data, the calculation of item probability indices, the dynamic adaptation of test content, the sequencing of items and the construction of a hierarchical scale system. Simulation experiments demonstrate that this approach enhances the efficiency and accuracy of psychological testing, particularly in diagnosing moderate to severe symptoms. However, the algorithm exhibits relatively lower accuracy for mild symptoms owing to their lower positive rate. The proposed algorithm significantly improves the optimization of psychological testing scales, particularly excelling in the assessment of moderate symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.