ArticleRoyal Society open science2025
Recording artist career comparison through audio content analysis.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Audio content analysis can be deployed to examine relationships within and between collected works of different music artists, allowing a new approach to comparative analysis of recorded music within the domain of computational musicology. Although current-generation automatic transcription retains some flaws with respect to expert human analysis, there is a consistency to applying the same algorithms on disparate works, and the benefit of tireless calculation with explicit open bias. In the present study, three successful alternative rock groups, and three 'control' artists, all from either the United States or the UK, are compared with respect to their musical careers through their main recorded releases (spanning the years 1983-2021 for the main three and 1957-2000 for the controls). Statistical measures of variation over time, and the diversity of their recorded output, are used to answer research questions on their studio career and the originality of their work. The techniques explored here are immediately pertinent to study other artists outside of this starting point, and we discuss the potential and challenges of such approaches for the musicology of recorded music.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.