ArticleRoyal Society open science2025
Highlighting the resilience potential of marine protected areas in the face of coral bleaching with passive acoustic monitoring.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A dataset of soundscapes from Polynesian altiphotic, mesophotic and rariphotic zones.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Highlighting the resilience potential of marine protected areas in the face of coral bleaching with passive acoustic monitoring.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) can increase the resilience of reef communities to disturbances, playing a role in sheltering biodiversity from climate-related impacts. To determine if the protection status allows for better resilience after coral bleaching events, we recorded soundscapes of eight reefs of Moorea Island (French Polynesia). We compared the biophony of MPAs to the one of adjacent non-protected zones recorded in 2015, before two bleaching events (2016 and 2019), to the one in 2021. Then, the biophony from 2021 was compared within and outside MPAs. We hypothesize that differences in the biophony between these periods vary within and outside MPAs. The main result is an increase in the nocturnal high frequency (2-22 kHz) mass phenomena of benthic invertebrates, observed at sites with higher coral cover post-bleaching compared to pre-bleaching: nocturnal power spectral density (PSD) and peak frequency of invertebrate sounds varied between 2015 and 2021. For fish sounds, no daytime difference was observed, while nocturnal PSD was higher in 2021. These observations reflect distinct bleaching histories. High-frequency PSD measurements and the associated frequency values demonstrated strong correlation with temporal changes in coral cover. We suggest including it in long-term reef monitoring due to its complementary nature with respect to classical methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.