ArticleThe annals of applied statistics2024
VARIANCE AS A PREDICTOR OF HEALTH OUTCOMES: SUBJECT-LEVEL TRAJECTORIES AND VARIABILITY OF SEX HORMONES TO PREDICT BODY FAT CHANGES IN PERI- AND POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN.
Article in The annals of applied statistics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using subject-level variability to predict time-varying outcomes: investigating the association between hormone variability and BMD trajectories over the menopausal transition.Journal of applied statistics · 2026Article
- VARIANCE AS A PREDICTOR OF HEALTH OUTCOMES: SUBJECT-LEVEL TRAJECTORIES AND VARIABILITY OF SEX HORMONES TO PREDICT BODY FAT CHANGES IN PERI- AND POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN.The annals of applied statistics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Longitudinal biomarker data and cross-sectional outcomes are routinely collected in modern epidemiology studies, often with the goal of informing tailored early intervention decisions. For example, hormones, such as estradiol (E2) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), may predict changes in womens' health during the midlife. Most existing methods focus on constructing predictors from mean marker trajectories. However, subject-level biomarker variability may also provide critical information about disease risks and health outcomes. Current literature does not provide statistical models to investigate such relationships with valid uncertainty quantification. In this paper we develop a fully Bayesian joint model that estimates subject-level means, variances, and covariances of multiple longitudinal biomarkers and uses these as predictors to evaluate their respective associations with a cross-sectional health outcome. Simulations demonstrate excellent recovery of true model parameters. The proposed method provides less biased and more efficient estimates, relative to alternative approaches that either ignore subject-level differences in variances or perform two-stage estimation where estimated marker variances are treated as observed. Empowered by the model, analyses of women's health data reveal, for the first time, that larger variability of E2 was associated with slower increases in waist circumference across the menopausal transition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.