ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Comparison between compositional data analysis and principal component analysis for identifying dietary patterns associated with hyperuricemia.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/objectives: Dietary patterns play an important role in regulating serum uric acid (SUA) levels in the body. Recently, compositional data analysis (CoDA) has been proposed as an alternative technique in identifying dietary patterns. However, the relative advantages of CoDA, particularly in identifying dietary patterns associated with hyperuricemia have not been investigated. We evaluated and compared CoDA, including compositional principal component analysis (CPCA) and principal balances analysis (PBA), with the most commonly used principal component analysis (PCA) in determining dietary patterns associated with hyperuricemia. Methods: The 3 day 24-h dietary recall method was used to estimate dietary data from 3,954 study participants of the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS). Dietary patterns were constructed using PCA, CPCA and PBA. These methods were compared based on the performance to identify plausible patterns associated with hyperuricemia. Results: PCA, CPCA and PBA all identified three dietary patterns, with a common "traditional southern Chinese" pattern high in rice and animal-based foods and low in wheat products and dairy. Only this pattern was positively associated with risk of hyperuricemia [PCA: OR (95%CI) = 1.29 (1.15-1.46); CPCA: OR (95%CI) = 1.25 (1.10-1.40); PBA: OR (95%CI) = 1.23 (1.09-1.38)]. Conclusion: All three dietary patterns methods in our study identified that a "traditional southern Chinese" dietary pattern was associated with increased risk of hyperuricemia, suggesting a robust and consistent finding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.