ArticleMedical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran2025
Assessing Health System Responsiveness in Iraq: A Comprehensive Evaluation through Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Responsiveness is an indicator by the World Health Organization (WHO) to evaluate the performance of health systems on nonmedical expectations of consumers. This study aimed to assess the responsiveness of the health system in Iraq, focusing on urban and rural populations across 6 provinces: Baghdad, Wasit, Karbala, An-Najaf, Babil, and Maysan. Methods: A cross-sectional study design was employed, involving a total population of 2400 individuals from 400 households in each province. Cluster sampling was utilized to select participants, with data collected using the World Health Organization's "Global Health Survey" questionnaire, which assesses 7 dimensions of health system responsiveness. These data were analyzed using Stata Version 17 to examine statistical relationships, while Microsoft Excel was used to generate visualizations. Descriptive statistics included frequencies and percentages for qualitative variables, and means with standard deviations for quantitative variables. Results: The findings revealed a high prioritization among respondents for the following aspects of health system responsiveness: quality of facilities (95%), confidentiality of personal information (93.71%), and prompt attention (90.72%). Clarity of communication (61.79%) and autonomy (60.91%) were rated as the most favorable dimensions, while prompt attention (58.94%) and quality of facilities (55.46%) received the lowest ratings. Experiences of discrimination were prevalent, with 34.50% reporting discrimination based on financial status, 26.87% based on social class, and 21.37% based on sex. Conclusion: The study underscores the urgent need for improvements in health system responsiveness in Iraq, particularly in areas such as prompt response and service quality. Addressing these issues is crucial for enhancing the overall effectiveness and equity of healthcare services in the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.