ReviewWorld journal of stem cells2025
When hematology meets ophthalmology: Cytomegalovirus retinitis in pediatric stem cell recipients.
Review in World journal of stem cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis is a significant yet infrequent complication in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, occurring in approximately 4% of cases. Its presentation typically coincides with immune reconstitution, between 6 weeks to 6 months post-transplant, emphasizing the need for timely detection. Symptoms often develop insidiously, underscoring the role of fundus examinations during episodes of CMV viremia. However, the low incidence challenges the necessity of routine screenings, as they may strain clinical resources without clear benefits to patient outcomes. Management includes systemic and intravitreal antivirals, such as ganciclovir and foscarnet, and adoptive T-cell therapy for refractory cases. Tailored follow-up strategies are crucial, with considerations for lesion activity and CMV viremia status to determine the duration of therapy. Baseline and post-transplant screenings remain a topic of debate, with evolving guidelines needed to balance patient safety and clinical feasibility. Future research is needed to address optimal screening intervals and investigate the role of pre-existing CMV serostatus in transplant eligibility and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.