ArticleiScience2025
SARS-CoV-2 vaccines elicit differential Fc effector functions.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Adaptive Phase I/II Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial to Determine Safety, Immunogenicity and Efficacy of Non-replicating ChAdOx1 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in South African Adults Living Without HIV; and Safety and Immunogenicity in Adults Living With HIV
Open-label, Single-arm Phase 3B Implementation Study to Monitor the Effectiveness of the Single-dose Ad26.COV2.S COVID-19 Vaccine Among Health Care Workers in South Africa (VAC31518COV3012)
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Immune Mechanisms and Translational Study Design in Viral Vaccine Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In addition to neutralization, Fc effector function contributes to vaccine-mediated protection against severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, differential coordination and cross-reactivity of Fc effector functions across vaccines is not clearly defined. A secondary analysis of three vaccines with BNT162b2, Ad26.CoV2.S (NCT04838795), and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (NCT04444674) reveals that BNT162b2 elicits the highest levels of binding, neutralization, and Fc effector function with antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), phagocytosis (ADCP), and complement deposition (ADCD) significantly differing by vaccine modality. Ad26.CoV2.S showed low ADCD activity before a homologous boost, which significantly increased this function. BNT162b2 vaccination triggered higher levels of cross-reactive neutralization, ADCC and ADCP than the adenoviral vaccines, while ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 exhibited higher ADCD cross-reactivity. Coordination between functions all varied by modality, with vaccination eliciting neutralization and binding correlations with ADCC for BNT162b2, but with ADCD following Ad26.CoV2.S vaccination. This supports the optimization of Fc effector functions for improved polyfunctional vaccine design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.