ArticleJournal of rheology2016
Linear and nonlinear microrheometry of small samples and interfaces using microfabricated probes.
Article in Journal of rheology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating simultaneous interfacial shear rheology with neutron reflectometry for structural and dynamic analysis of fluid interfacial systems.Journal of applied crystallography · 2026Article
- Phospholipase-catalyzed degradation drives domain morphology and rheology transitions in model lung surfactant monolayers.Soft matter · 2024Article
- Janus Particles at Fluid Interfaces: Stability and Interfacial Rheology.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Interfacial rheology and direct imaging reveal domain-templated network formation in phospholipid monolayers penetrated by fibrinogen.Soft matter · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We describe a microrheological strategy that enables sensitive surface shear rheology measurements of surfactant-laden interfaces, with the capacity to simultaneously visualize deforming interfaces. This technique utilizes a ferromagnetic microbutton probe pinned to a fluid-fluid interface, and actively torqued or forced with externally-controlled electromagnets. Various modes of operation are possible: small-amplitude oscillatory rotations, which provide frequency-dependent viscoelastic shear moduli; controlled torque (analogous to fixing shear stress); controlled rotation rate (analogous to fixing strain rate), and imposed force (analogous to active, translational microrheology). The circular shape of the probe ensures pure shear strains (when driven to rotate). We describe the experimental apparatus, its measurement limits and sources of error. We then highlight its versatility and capabilities with measurements on a variety of qualitatively distinct systems, including purely viscous monolayers, block-copolymer interfaces, aging and evolving interfaces, colloidal monolayers, and bulk rheometry of Newtonian and viscoelastic materials, with sample volumes as small as 2
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.