Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40740427›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2025

The physiology and psychology of negative splits: insights into optimal marathon pacing strategies.

Gerasimos V Grivas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gerasimos V GrivasPhysical Education and Sports, Division of Humanities and Political Sciences, Hellenic Naval Academy, Piraeus, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pacing strategy plays a critical role in marathon performance, influencing both physiological stress and race outcomes. Among the available pacing approaches, the negative split running the second half faster than the first has emerged as a potentially optimal strategy for endurance athletes. This mini-review explores the physiological mechanisms and psychological factors underpinning the effectiveness of negative splits in marathon running. Key advantages include improved energy conservation and glycogen sparing, enhanced thermoregulation, and reduced cardiovascular drift. These benefits contribute to delayed fatigue and greater efficiency in the latter stages of the race. Training modalities such as progressive long runs and fast-finish workouts, along with psychological techniques like goal setting and visualization, are discussed as tools to help runners implement negative split strategies. The article also examines the limitations and applicability of negative splits among elite and recreational runners, highlighting the need for individualized approaches based on fitness level, environmental conditions, and race profile. In conclusion, while not universally applicable, negative splits represent a scientifically grounded pacing method that may optimize performance in marathon running across a range of athlete populations.

Indexed as

cardiovascular driftendurance performancemarathon pacingnegative splitsthermoregulation

Identifiers

PMID40740427
PMCPMC12307312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.