ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Political orientation and COVID-19 policy preferences during the early pandemic: a comparative analysis of China and South Korea.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic posed an unprecedented challenge to governments and societies worldwide, highlighting the complex relationship between state policies and public acceptance during crises. This study examines how regime types, political tendencies, and social culture influence citizen's preferences for epidemic prevention policies in China and South Korea. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional online survey was operated in May 2020 to citizens aged ≥ 20 years in China and South Korea. Using the stratified quota sampling method, This study collected 2,254 valid responses from China and 1,783 from South Korea. Moderated mediation effect analysis were conducted to explore the factors shaping public attitudes toward epidemic control measures. Results: There are clear differences in policy preferences between the two countries. Chinese citizens were more likely to support strict, government-led measures, while South Korean respondents showed lower levels of support. Political tendency was the strongest predictor of policy preferences in both countries, with those favoring greater government authority more likely to support strict epidemic control measures. While government satisfaction significantly influenced policy acceptance in China, its impact was minimal in South Korea. Additionally, collectivism moderated the relationship between political tendency and policy preferences. In highly collectivist environments, social norms reinforced support for control measures, while in more individualist contexts, personal political beliefs had a stronger influence on policy acceptance. Conclusion: This study provides important evidence that citizen preferences for epidemic prevention are shaped by complex interaction between political institutions, cultural values, and individual beliefs. These findings can inform more effective communication strategies and policy design when governments prepare for future pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.