ReviewFrontiers in public health2025
Applying implementation science to infectious disease emergency preparedness and response.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Improving complex systems with improve-mentation: challenges and solutions.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Some infectious disease outbreaks present an emergency and a potential disaster scenario. Examples include a new virus similar to or more infectious and deadly than COVID-19 or Ebola, such as the 2025 MERS-like virus. Although good practices for general emergency preparedness and management can be used to plan, there are different and less-known preparations and responses needed for some infectious disease outbreaks and continuing and evolving crises. The objectives of this article are to provide guidance about how to plan and respond to these types of emergencies more effectively by using implementation science knowledge as well as lessons from COVID-19 and other infectious disease emergencies. This narrative review gives guidance for healthcare service delivery leaders at different levels of a healthcare system and easy to understand and use resources for leaders to improve their infectious disease emergency preparedness and operational actions in a disaster scenario. The implementation science guidance covers: interventions, adaptation to context, iteration, coordination for alignment, facilitation, and how to use behavior and organization change models and theories. It also provides researchers with an overview of issues and frameworks to help focus their research designs and data collection to study intervention implementation processes and outcomes for infectious disease outbreaks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.