Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40740384›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Explainable machine learning prediction of internet addiction among Chinese primary and middle school children and adolescents: a longitudinal study based on positive youth development data (2019-2022).

Jiahe Liu, Lang Chen, Yuxin Chen, Jingsong Luo, Kexin Yu, Linlin Fan, Chan Yong, Huiyu He, Simei Liao, Zongyuan Ge and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jiahe Liu *AIM for Health Lab, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Lang Chen *School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Yuxin Chen *Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Jingsong LuoJockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Kexin YuJockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Linlin FanWest China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Chan YongWest China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Huiyu HeWest China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Simei LiaoSchool of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Peking, China.
Zongyuan GeAIM for Health Lab, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Lihua JiangWest China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Internet Addiction (IA) has emerged as a critical concern, especially among school age children and adolescents, potentially stalling their physical and mental development. Our study aimed to examine the risk factors associated with IA among Chinese children and adolescents and leverage explainable machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict IA status at the time of assessment, based on Young's Internet Addiction Test. Methods: The longitudinal data consisting of 8,824 schoolchildren from the Chengdu Positive Child Development (CPCD) survey were analyzed, where 33.3% of participants were identified with IA (Age: 10.97 ± 2.31, Male: 51.73%). IA was defined using Young's Internet Addiction Test (IAT ≥ 40). Demographic variables such as age, gender, and grade level, along with key variables including scores of Cognitive Behavioral Competencies (CBC), Prosocial Attributes (PA), Positive Identity (PI), General Positive Youth Development Qualities (GPYDQ), Life Satisfaction (LS), Delinquent Behavior (DB), Non-Suicidal Self-Injury (NSSI), Depression (DP), Anxiety (AX), Family Function Disorders (FF), Egocentrism (EG), Empathy (EP), Academic Intrinsic Value (IV), and Academic Utility Value (UV) were examined. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests were employed to validate the significance of the mentioned predictors of IA. We applied six ML models: Extra Random Forest, XGBoost, Logistic Regression, Bernoulli Naïve Bayes, Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), and Transformer Encoder. Performance was evaluated via 10-fold cross-validation and held-out test sets across survey waves. Feature selection and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis were utilised for model improvement and interpretability, respectively. Results: ExtraRFC achieved the best performance (Test AUC = 0.854, Accuracy = 0.798, F1 = 0.659), outperforming all other models across most metrics and external validations. Key predictors included grade level, delinquent behavior, anxiety, family function, and depression scores. SHAP analysis revealed consistent and interpretable feature contributions across individuals. Conclusion: Depression, anxiety, and family dynamics are significant factors influencing IA in children. The Extra Random Forest model proves most effective in predicting IA, emphasising the importance of addressing these factors to promote healthy digital habits in children. This study presents an effective SHAP-based explainable ML framework for IA prediction in children and adolescents.

Indexed as

InternetInternet Addiction DisorderMachine LearningAdolescentChildChinaEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleRisk FactorsSurveys and Questionnairesadolescent and childrenextra random forestinternet addictionlongitudinal studymachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40740384
PMCPMC12307306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.