ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Consumption patterns and attitudinal insights on artificial sweeteners in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Artificial sweeteners (AS) are increasingly used as sugar substitutes in Saudi Arabia, yet no studies have examined the patterns and attitudes related to their consumption. Aim: To investigate AS consumption behaviors and attitudes among Saudi adults. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 386 Saudi adults using a validated online questionnaire, which included the Artificial Sweeteners Attitudes Scale (AASS) to assess acceptance, risk perception, perceived benefits, trust in regulators, and motivation for natural alternatives. Descriptive statistics summarized consumption patterns, and chi-square tests, regression analyses, and a hurdle model were applied to identify predictors of AS use. Results: About 42% of participants reported regular AS consumption, with 65% using AS primarily for weight management and 74.19% believing AS supports a healthy lifestyle. Education level was significantly associated with AS use ( Conclusion: This study highlights a high prevalence of AS use among Saudi adults, largely motivated by weight management goals but tempered by health concerns and a preference for natural foods. These findings underscore the need for targeted educational and public health interventions to support informed dietary choices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.