ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Promoting healthy aging through intergenerational exchange and digital empowerment: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06162871 (The Effect of Social Participation As a Key Determinant of Healthy Aging), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of Social Participation As a Key Determinant of Healthy Aging
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating digital health literacy interventions for adults 45+ years: a scoping review.Health promotion international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Social isolation and loneliness are major public health concern among individuals aged 65 and older, as they are associated with increased risks of morbidity and mortality. Intergenerational programs have emerged as promising interventions to mitigate these issues by fostering social participation and enhancing overall well-being. Interventions that also incorporate digital literacy support may further help address the relevant digital divide, which significantly contributes to social exclusion, particularly among older adults. This pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a psychosocial intervention focused on intergenerational exchange and digital literacy. Methods: A 12-week crossover randomized controlled trial (RCT) design was employed. The intervention engaged younger and older participants in co-preparing seminar presentations, discussing these, and participating in plenary meetings-both in-person and online-on self-selected health, cultural, and topics meaningful from an individual perspective. Feasibility indicators included dropout rates and participant satisfaction. Preliminary measures of improvement were assessed using the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) for quality of life, the Brief Social Rhythms Scale (BSRS) for the regularity of social and biological rhythms, and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for depressive symptoms. Results: A total of 12 participants were included in the experimental group and 9 in the control group. Feasibility outcomes showed an overall dropout rate of 28.57%, similarly to comparable trials. Notably, the attrition rate was lower in the experimental group (16.67%). Participant satisfaction was particularly high (M = 37.06, SD = 3.08). Preliminary analyses revealed a statistically significant improvement only in BSRS; 66.6% vs. 26.67%, Conclusions: The findings suggest very high satisfaction and moderate engagement among older adults involved in the program. Given the positive impact on the regularity of biological and behavioral rhythms-recognized as key protective factors in healthy aging-the improvement observed is particularly promising. Future studies with larger samples and extended follow-up periods are needed to corroborate this preliminary evidence. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT06162871.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.