ArticleTurkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation2025
Assessment of the external construct validity of the Brief International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Core Set for chronic ischemic heart disease in a Turkish population.
Article in Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to validate the Brief International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) Core Set for chronic ischemic heart disease (CIHD) in a Turkish patient population, identifying the most common problems in ICF categories and testing its construct validity. Patients and methods: A total of 85 patients (28 males, 57 females; mean age: 64.4±12.2 years; range, 37 to 88 years) diagnosed with CIHD who were referred to our cardiac rehabilitation outpatient clinic were included in the cross-sectional study between February 2014 and August 2015. Brief ICF Core Set for CIHD, which includes 36 second-level categories, was used to assess the most common impairments. Correlations between these impairments and various clinical assessment scales were analyzed to test construct validity. Results: The most impaired categories in body functions were heart functions, blood pressure functions, exercise tolerance functions, blood vessel functions, sensations associated with cardiovascular and respiratory functions, and energy and drive functions. In the body structure component, the structure of the cardiovascular system was identified as a problem in 97.6% of patients. The activities and participation component revealed that moving around, remunerative employment, and carrying out daily routines were frequently problematic. All of the environmental factors were identified as both barriers and facilitators. Significant correlations were found between these categories and various clinical assessment scales. Conclusion: The Brief ICF Core Set for CIHD is a valid tool for assessing the multifaceted impact of CIHD in a Turkish patient population. This validation supports its use for comprehensive, patient-centered evaluations in clinical settings, emphasizing the need for a holistic approach to managing CIHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.