ArticleTurkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation2025
Ultrasound-guided prolotherapy versus corticosteroid injections for the treatment of patients with plantar fasciitis: A randomized controlled trial.
Article in Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and Safety of Dextrose Prolotherapy Versus Corticosteroid Injections in Plantar Fasciitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2026Pooled it
- Comment to the article: Where and how should prolotherapy and steroid injections be administered for optimal outcomes in plantar fasciitis?Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection (CSI) and ultrasound-guided dextrose prolotherapy (DP) in treating patients with plantar fasciitis (PF). Patients and methods: This single-center, randomized controlled, double-blind trial was conducted with 38 patients (24 females, 14 males; mean age: 48.2±6.1 years; range, 30 to 57 years) with PF between March 10, 2021 and June 10, 2021. Patients with definitive PF fulfilled the eligibility requirements and were included in the study. Block randomization was used to assign each patient to CSI and DP treatment arms. Patients in the CSI and DP treatment arms received methylprednisolone and dextrose, respectively. Lidocaine injection was used for local anesthesia, and ultrasound was used to guide these minimally invasive procedures. Patients were followed up after one (short term) and three months (middle term). Primary outcomes were pain severity and foot function. Results: In both groups, we detected a significant improvement in pain severity and foot function index in the middle term, which was slightly more profound in the DP group. In contrast to the CSI arm, DP did not appear to alleviate pain in the short term. We observed a waning treatment effectiveness in the CSI arm over time. Conclusion: Both CSI and DP were effective in treating PF by reducing pain and improving foot function index in the middle term. While CSI ensures better short-term outcomes, its effectiveness tends to wane over time. On the contrary, DP does not provide significant short-term relief but is more effective in the middle term. Further trials are needed to support these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.