Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40740131›Full record

ReviewCirculation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology2025

2025 International Expert Practical Guide on the Use of the Pentaspline Pulsed Field Ablation System in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Procedures.

Shaojie Chen, Sanjiv M Narayan, Serge Boveda, Kars Neven, Martin H Ruwald, Martin Martinek, Piotr Futyma, Christian Meyer, Christian-Hendrik Heeger, Philipp Sommer and 13 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pulsed field ablation for the interventional treatment of atrial fibrillation: a scientific statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society, and the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Intracardiac Echocardiography during Invasive Electrophysiological Procedures: a Scientific Statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the ESC, and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions of the ESC.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Peri-procedure and Mid-Long Term Effects of Pulsed Field Ablation vs. Thermal Ablation (Cryo- or Radiofrequency) on Autonomic Nervous System Function in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic and Quantitative Pooled-Analysis with Potential Implications for Patient Selection (The PULSE-COLD-HEAT-ANS Collaboration).Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  5. Pulsed-field ablation for refractory typical atrial flutter resistant to multiple radiofrequency ablations: A technical report.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Temperature as a "hidden dose" in pulsed field ablation: toward temperature-aware workflows and reproducible reporting.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Optimized workflow for pentaspline PFA and its impact on PVI durability: evidence from systematic remapping.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Shaojie ChenRhythmology and Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology, Klinik Internal Medicine B (Cardiology, Angiology, Pneumology and Internal Intensive Care Medicine), University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany (S.C.).ORCID 0000-0002-7082-9573
Sanjiv M NarayanDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cardiovascular Institute, Centre for Arrhythmia Research, Stanford University, CA (S.M.N.).ORCID 0000-0001-7552-5053
Serge BovedaCardiology and Heart Rhythm Management Department, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France (S.B.).ORCID 0000-0002-1280-7042
Kars NevenDepartment of Electrophysiology, Alfried Krupp Krankenhaus, Essen and Department of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Germany (K.N.).ORCID 0000-0002-2075-8113
Martin H RuwaldDivision of Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark (M.H.R.).ORCID 0000-0002-1541-309X
Martin MartinekDepartment for Internal Medicine II, Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus, Ordensklinikum Linz Elisabethinen, Austria (S.C., M.M.).ORCID 0000-0002-8895-8488
Piotr FutymaClinical Electrophysiology, St. Joseph's Heart Rhythm Centre, University of Rzeszów, Poland (P.F.).ORCID 0000-0003-0219-7612
Christian MeyerDivision of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care, cardiac Neuro- and Electrophysiology Rsrch Consortium (cNEP), EVK Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany (C.M.).ORCID 0000-0003-0217-3960
Christian-Hendrik HeegerDepartment of Rhythmology, Cardiology and Internal medicine, Asklepios Klinik Hamburg Altona Hamburg and Department of Rhythmology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany (C.-H.H.).ORCID 0000-0002-9014-8097
Philipp SommerClinic for Electrophysiology, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Med Fakultät OWL der Universität Bielefeld, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany (P.S.).ORCID 0000-0002-3037-8704
Alexandra SchratterDepartment of Cardiology, Klinik Floridsdorf, Vienna, Austria (A.S.).ORCID 0009-0001-9019-4608
Bart A MulderDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands (B.A.M.).ORCID 0000-0002-4411-3918
Márcio Galindo KiuchiSchool of Medicine-Royal Perth Hospital Unit, University of Western Australia, Australia (M.G.K.).ORCID 0000-0002-1155-8590
Pipin KojodjojoAsian Heart and Vascular Centre, Singapore, Singapore (P.K., J.C.).ORCID 0000-0002-6295-4905
Jeremy ChowAsian Heart and Vascular Centre, Singapore, Singapore (P.K., J.C.).
Mark T K TamDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong (M.T.K.T.).ORCID 0000-0002-6119-641X
Zhijun SunDepartment of Cardiology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, China (Z.S.).ORCID 0000-0003-2962-5488
Jingquan ZhongDepartment of Cardiology, Qilu Hospital (Qingdao and Jinan), Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, China (J.Z.).ORCID 0000-0001-9547-4070
Yuehui YinDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, China (Y.Y.).
Boris SchmidtCardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien (CCB), Medizinische Klinik III, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany (S.C., B.S., J.K.R.C.).ORCID 0000-0001-5347-9906
Julian K R ChunCardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien (CCB), Medizinische Klinik III, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany (S.C., B.S., J.K.R.C.).ORCID 0000-0002-2355-6015
Minglong ChenDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, China (M.C.).ORCID 0000-0002-9844-486X
Helmut PürerfellnerDepartment of Cardiology/Electrophysiology, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus, Ordensklinikum Linz Elisabethinen, Austria (H.P.).ORCID 0000-0002-8965-8495

Funding

The Dynamics of Human Atrial FibrillationR01HL083359 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Sanjiv M Narayan · 2008 to 2026
$7.9M
Machine Learning in Atrial FibrillationR01HL149134 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI NARAYAN, SANJIV M · 2020 to 2024
$3.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL083359NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL149134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has been developed as a largely nonthermal ablation technology with a unique biophysical profile to treat atrial fibrillation. Existing evidence has shown that PFA offers a safe and efficient atrial fibrillation ablation procedure. Among different PFA technologies, the pentaspline FARAPULSE system has been the most extensively used and investigated; however, notable variability exists in workflow, fluoroscopy time, and lesion durability. While innovations such as 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping systems and intracardiac echocardiography can enhance procedural precision in catheter ablation, fluoroscopy remains the primary imaging modality for guiding pentaspline PFA in many electrophysiology labs worldwide. This is particularly true in centers where limitations in cost, infrastructure, or training may preclude the routine use of advanced imaging technologies. This article summarizes general practical considerations and presents a primarily fluoroscopy-based, refined workflow developed by a group of experts. The goal is to provide a procedural foundation and practical guide for using the pentaspline FARAPULSE PFA system in atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. Developing a fluoroscopy-based practical guide would: (1) Democratize access to PFA technology, enabling safe and effective implementation across a broader range of clinical settings, including those without intracardiac echocardiography or 3-dimensional mapping support; (2) Reduce procedural heterogeneity by offering reproducible best practices; (3) Facilitate meaningful intercenter comparisons of procedural efficacy and safety, aiding in the identification of optimal approaches and improving the quality of clinical data for ongoing research, registries, and real-world performance monitoring of PFA technologies; and (4) Ultimately improve patient outcomes through standardized, accessible, and evidence-based practices.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationFluoroscopyHeart RateHumansTreatment OutcomeWorkflowatrial fibrillationcatheter ablationpractical guidepulsed field ablationworkflow

Identifiers

PMID40740131
PMCPMC12533784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.