Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40739922›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2025

Why people matter in 21st century hydrology: lessons learnt from flood forecasting and warning.

Linda Speight

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Hydrology in the 21st century: challenges in science, to policy and practice.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Linda SpeightSchool of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8700-157X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a world facing the challenge of adapting to a rapidly changing climate, hydrologists have an important role in ensuring the risks from floods, droughts and polluted water are addressed. Despite ongoing scientific advances, and a growing focus on people-centred hydrology that supports solutions to global hydrological challenges, there remains a disconnect between hydrological expertise, policy and practice. The best hydrological models in the world are no use to society if they do not result in effective action. The devastating impacts from recent unprecedented flood events in Europe highlight the urgency of addressing this challenge. Reflecting on the communication of flood risk during extreme events offers valuable insights into why people matter to closing the gap between hydrological expertise and society. People are considered here in respect to four themes: people and hydrological science, people and hydrology education, people and hydrological decision making and people within the discipline of hydrology. As a discipline hydrology must better articulate why it matters to people to allow it to overcome the challenges of complacency and complexity in risk communication. Hydrologists themselves must be flexible and innovative, developing new skills sets to support continued interdisciplinary collaborations and expertise to better integrate people into hydrology.This article is part of the discussion meeting issue 'Hydrology in the 21st century: challenges in science, to policy and practice'.

Indexed as

climate adaptationdecision makingflood warninghydrologypeoplerisk communication

Identifiers

PMID40739922
PMCPMC12311491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.