ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2025
Should Anaesthesiologists Be Taught to Perform Ultrasound-Assisted Neuraxial Access in Spinal Anaesthesia?-Protocol of a Randomised Controlled Study.
Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of anesthetic effects of spinal anesthesia at L5-S1 and L3-4 under real-time ultrasound guidance in total knee arthroplasty: a single center randomized controlled trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Trial
- Should Anaesthesiologists Be Taught to Perform Ultrasound-Assisted Neuraxial Access in Spinal Anaesthesia?-Protocol of a Randomised Controlled Study.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeuraxial blockade, typically guided by manual palpation, can be challenging in certain patient populations. Ultrasound-assisted neuraxial access has the potential to improve success rates, particularly for novice anaesthesiologists, though structured training programs in this technique are limited.
methodsThis multicentre, randomised controlled trial will evaluate the use of ultrasound-assisted neuraxial block, following a simulation-based training programme based on the mastery-learning approach. Participants, consisting of novice and senior anaesthesiologists, will receive training in either ultrasound-assisted or traditional manual palpation techniques. Performance will be assessed in a clinical setting during elective lower limb surgery. Statistical analyses will compare the clinical outcomes of ultrasound-assisted versus manual palpation techniques.
resultsThe primary outcome is the success rate of the first spinal block attempt. Secondary outcomes include the number of attempts, needle redirections, time spent, and the need for additional interventions. Patient satisfaction and complications will be evaluated as tertiary outcomes.
conclusionThis study may present the potential impact of a structured training program on anaesthesiologists' skills in ultrasound-assisted neuraxial access and potentially lead to better patient outcomes. By comparing ultrasound-assisted techniques with traditional manual palpation, the findings may lead to improvements in training methods and ultrasound-assisted approaches for neuraxial access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.