ArticleBMC emergency medicine2025
Non-clinical factors influencing discharge and admission decisions in the emergency department: a focus group study among Israeli physicians.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk factors associated with prolonged stay in the post-anesthesia care unit: a case-control study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Influence of non-clinical factors on emergency department decision-making: a Delphi study.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Reduction of resources with mRNA host-response whole blood testing on patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected infections: a retrospective analysis of 30 cases.Journal of medical microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmergency department (ED) physicians frequently make high-stakes decisions under time constraints. While clinical indicators are essential, non-clinical factors often shape whether a patient is admitted or discharged. However, the specific non-clinical influences and how physicians perceive them remain underexplored.
objectiveTo identify and categorize non-clinical factors that influence admission decisions among ED physicians.
methodsThis qualitative study involved five focus groups with 42 participants (specialists, residents, and physician assistants) across five Israeli hospitals. A semi-structured discussion guide, informed by literature and expert interviews, was used. Audio-recordings were transcribed and analyzed thematically using a mixed inductive and deductive approach.
resultsThree overarching domains of non-clinical influences emerged: (1) patient-related factors (preferences, social support, functional status, access to care), (2) physician-related factors (experience, risk tolerance, workload, prior errors), and (3) system-level factors (bed capacity, ED protocols, communication gaps, resource availability). Physicians often weighed these elements alongside clinical indications for admission, particularly in borderline cases. Functional status and family support frequently influenced safe discharge decisions. Physician experience emerged as a buffer against risk-averse behaviors. System-level pressures, such as ED crowding and administrative policies, further shaped clinical discretion.
conclusionNon-clinical factors substantially influence ED disposition decisions. These findings highlight the need for policy reforms, decision-support tools, and further research to guide when and how non-clinical factors should inform care. This study offers a framework for understanding such influences and can inform interventions aimed at improving ED efficiency and patient outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.