Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40739607›Full record

SynthesisBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2025

Measuring juvenile habitat quality for fishes and invertebrates.

Benjamin J Ciotti, Elliot J Brown, Francesco Colloca, David B Eggleston, A Challen Hyman, Olivier Le Pape, Romuald N Lipcius, Margot A M Maathuis, Suzanne S H Poiesz, Kenneth A Rose and 3 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Benjamin J CiottiUniversity of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5769-1437
Elliot J BrownNational Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark (DTU Aqua), Kemitorvet, Building 201, Kongens Lyngby, 2800, Denmark.
Francesco CollocaDepartment of Integrative Marine Ecology, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Via G. Allegri 1, Rome, 00198, Italy.
David B EgglestonNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27695, USA.
A Challen HymanVirginia Institute of Marine Science, William & Mary, P.O. Box 1346, Gloucester Point, Virginia, 23062, USA.
Olivier Le PapeDECOD (Ecosystem Dynamics and Sustainability), Institut Agro, INRAe, Ifremer 65 rue de Saint-Brieuc, Rennes Cedex, 35042, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7233-7951
Romuald N LipciusVirginia Institute of Marine Science, William & Mary, P.O. Box 1346, Gloucester Point, Virginia, 23062, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7485-797X
Margot A M MaathuisAquaculture and Fisheries Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, 6700 AH, The Netherlands.
Suzanne S H PoieszDepartment of Coastal Systems, NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, PO Box 59, Den Burg, Texel, 1790 AB, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1396-3618
Kenneth A RoseHorn Point Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, 2020 Horns Point Road, Cambridge, Maryland, 21613, USA.
Rochelle D SeitzVirginia Institute of Marine Science, William & Mary, P.O. Box 1346, Gloucester Point, Virginia, 23062, USA.
Daniele VenturaDepartment of Environmental Biology, University of Rome 'La Sapienza', V. le dell'Università 32, Rome, 00185, Italy.
Karen E van de WolfshaarWageningen Marine Research, Haringkade 1, IJmuiden, 1970 AB, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying the role of marine and estuarine habitats in supporting fish and invertebrate populations during vulnerable juvenile life stages is essential to achieve effective conservation and fisheries management. There remains general agreement that: (i) the quality of juvenile habitat is best measured as the contribution of juveniles to adult populations (here "juvenile-adult contribution") and (ii) this contribution may be measured directly or inferred from habitat-specific abundance, growth and survival. Obtaining effective estimates of juvenile habitat quality using these four metrics, however, is challenging. Through a systematic review of approaches to measure juvenile habitat quality, we critically evaluate current abilities to identify key habitats and provide recommendations for future work. We found that research in this area remains dominated by measurements of abundance (85% of studies) and, to a lesser extent growth (51% of studies), with limitations in the spatiotemporal resolution and extent of sampling. Relatively few approaches are available to measure survival and juvenile-adult contribution. Knowledge of juvenile habitat quality is further limited by restricted coverage of geographic areas, taxonomic groups and habitats. Based on our analysis of 874 studies over the past ca. 50 years, we provide five recommendations for enabling juvenile habitat research to support fisheries and conservation management better in future.

Indexed as

EcosystemFishesInvertebratesAnimalsConservation of Natural Resourcesecosystem‐based fisheries managementessential fish habitathabitat suitabilitylarvaemanaged realignmentMPAnursery groundrecruitmentrestorationsubadult

Identifiers

PMID40739607
PMCPMC12586312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.