Trial reportBMC ophthalmology2025
Clinical research on the application of AI-assisted computing systems in the treatment of intermittent exotropia.
Trial report in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the impact of AI-assisted computing systems on the effects of surgery, stereoscopic vision, and quality of life in patients with intermittent exotropia after treatment.
methodsData from a total of 108 children with intermittent exotropia were collected and randomly divided into Group A and Group B. Group A used the traditional prism calculation method, whereas Group B used the AI-assisted calculation system method. The success rate of surgery, the strabismus correction effect, postoperative stereoscopic function, far strabismus, near strabismus, horizontal and vertical perceptual eye positions, externally skewed deviation, and quality of life (Child-IXTQ score) were compared between the two groups.
resultsAt different time points (1 day, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery), the success rate of surgery in Group B was significantly higher than that in Group A, with an average difference in the success rate of 8.47 ± 1.92% (all P < 0.05). Compared with those at 1 day after surgery, the incidence rates of 6-m strabismus and 33-cm strabismus in the two groups of children were significantly lower at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery (all P < 0.05). Compared with the preoperative conditions, the central stereoscopic vision of the two groups of children significantly increased at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery, whereas the proportion of children without stereoscopic vision significantly decreased (all P < 0.05). Moreover, compared with preoperative conditions and 1 month postoperatively, the proportion of far-standing stereopsis gradually increased in both groups of patients at 3 and 6 months postoperatively (all P < 0.05). However, in terms of both central and far-standing stereoscopic vision, the rate of increase displayed by children in Group B was significantly greater than that in Group A (all P < 0.05). At various postoperative time points, the Child-IXTQ score of Group B was higher than that of Group A. At 6 months after surgery, the Child-IXTQ score of Group B reached its highest value (84.57 ± 5.32) (all P < 0.05).
conclusionAI-assisted computing systems can effectively improve the success rate of paediatric surgery, enhance the establishment of stereoscopic vision function, improve visual quality, and significantly improve quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.