Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40739541›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2025

Low-dose esketamine combined with propofol versus fentanyl-propofol for preventing hypoxemia during gastroscopy sedation in high-altitude residents: a randomized controlled trial.

Hui Xue, Pan Wei, Yun Wen, Shuhua He, Lan Yuan, Wei Song

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hui Xue *Department of Anesthesiology, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated With Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.528 Zhangheng Road, Shanghai, 201203, People's Republic of China.
Pan Wei *Department of Anesthesiology, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated With Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.528 Zhangheng Road, Shanghai, 201203, People's Republic of China.
Yun WenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Diqing Tibetan Hospital, Yunnan, 674400, China.
Shuhua HeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Diqing Tibetan Hospital, Yunnan, 674400, China.
Lan YuanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated With Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.528 Zhangheng Road, Shanghai, 201203, People's Republic of China. yuanhua01y@126.com.
Wei SongDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated With Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.528 Zhangheng Road, Shanghai, 201203, People's Republic of China. songweisrssd@163.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China NO.81603700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose esketamine combined with propofol in reducing the incidence of hypoxemia during deep sedation for painless gastroscopy in patients residing at high altitude Additionally, the study sought to inform the optimization of sedation protocols in hypobaric environments.

methodsA single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 168 patients residing at an altitude of 3200 m who were scheduled for elective gastroscopy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either low-dose esketamine (0.2 mg/kg) combined with propofol (experimental group) or fentanyl (1 µg/kg) combined with propofol (control group). The primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxemia, defined as peripheral oxygen saturation < 90% lasting more than 10 s. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative hemodynamic changes, total propofol dosage, and postoperative recovery parameters.

resultsThe incidence of hypoxemia was significantly lower in the experimental group compared to the control group (8.75% vs. 32.5%, p < 0.001). Incidences of hypotension (8.8% vs. 23.8%, p < 0.050) and somatic responses (2.5% vs. 12.5%, p < 0.050) were also reduced in the experimental group. The experimental group required a 25.5% lower total dose of propofol (143.1 ± 23.5 mg vs. 192.1 ± 34.1 mg, p < 0.001), achieved a shorter recovery time based on the Aldrete score (7.41 ± 1.61 min vs. 9.63 ± 2.41 min, p < 0.001), and yielded higher operator satisfaction scores (8.69 ± 0.6 vs. 7.79 ± 0.9, p < 0.001). No statistically significant difference was noted between groups regarding the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (2.5% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.560).

conclusionLow-dose esketamine combined with propofol is associated with a significantly lower incidence of hypoxemia and improved hemodynamic stability during gastroscopy sedation in patients residing at high altitude. This regimen also reduces propofol requirements, facilitates more rapid postoperative recovery, and is associated with greater proceduralist satisfaction, indicating its potential utility as a safe and effective sedation strategy in high-altitude clinical environments.

trial registrationFull name of the registry: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2500100947. Date of registration: 2025/04/17 (Retrospectively registered).

Indexed as

AltitudeDeep SedationFentanylGastroscopyHypnotics and SedativesHypoxiaKetaminePropofolAdultAnesthetics, IntravenousDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAnesthetics, IntravenousEsketamineFentanylHypnotics and SedativesKetaminePropofolDeep sedationEsketamineGastroscopyHigh altitudeHypoxemia

Identifiers

PMID40739541
PMCPMC12312424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.