Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2025
Low-dose esketamine combined with propofol versus fentanyl-propofol for preventing hypoxemia during gastroscopy sedation in high-altitude residents: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparative safety of esketamine in procedural sedation and analgesia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Pooled it
- Adjunctive esketamine in propofol-based sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose esketamine combined with propofol in reducing the incidence of hypoxemia during deep sedation for painless gastroscopy in patients residing at high altitude Additionally, the study sought to inform the optimization of sedation protocols in hypobaric environments.
methodsA single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 168 patients residing at an altitude of 3200 m who were scheduled for elective gastroscopy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either low-dose esketamine (0.2 mg/kg) combined with propofol (experimental group) or fentanyl (1 µg/kg) combined with propofol (control group). The primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxemia, defined as peripheral oxygen saturation < 90% lasting more than 10 s. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative hemodynamic changes, total propofol dosage, and postoperative recovery parameters.
resultsThe incidence of hypoxemia was significantly lower in the experimental group compared to the control group (8.75% vs. 32.5%, p < 0.001). Incidences of hypotension (8.8% vs. 23.8%, p < 0.050) and somatic responses (2.5% vs. 12.5%, p < 0.050) were also reduced in the experimental group. The experimental group required a 25.5% lower total dose of propofol (143.1 ± 23.5 mg vs. 192.1 ± 34.1 mg, p < 0.001), achieved a shorter recovery time based on the Aldrete score (7.41 ± 1.61 min vs. 9.63 ± 2.41 min, p < 0.001), and yielded higher operator satisfaction scores (8.69 ± 0.6 vs. 7.79 ± 0.9, p < 0.001). No statistically significant difference was noted between groups regarding the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (2.5% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.560).
conclusionLow-dose esketamine combined with propofol is associated with a significantly lower incidence of hypoxemia and improved hemodynamic stability during gastroscopy sedation in patients residing at high altitude. This regimen also reduces propofol requirements, facilitates more rapid postoperative recovery, and is associated with greater proceduralist satisfaction, indicating its potential utility as a safe and effective sedation strategy in high-altitude clinical environments.
trial registrationFull name of the registry: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2500100947. Date of registration: 2025/04/17 (Retrospectively registered).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.