ArticleConflict and health2025
A scoping review of epidemics of substance misuse and suicide in Syria: casualties of protracted conflict and political instability.
Article in Conflict and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An analysis of humanitarian and health aid harmonisation over a decade (2011-2019) of the Syrian conflict.BMJ global health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOver a decade of conflict in Syria had resulted in significant displacement and an increase in humanitarian needs. Emerging evidence points to a growing burden of substance misuse and deliberate self-harm- issues that remain underreported due to stigma, fear of criminalization, and a fragmented health system. This scoping review provides an overview of the prevalence, risk factors and health services available for these conditions inside Syria, supplemented by findings from an expert workshop with Syrian mental health stakeholders.
methodsA scoping review of academic and grey literature was conducted across PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and Google Scholar using terms related to substance misuse, suicide, self-harm, and Syria. Studies published on or after the onset of the Syrian conflict in 2011 and available in English or Arabic were included. These findings were contextualized with insights from an expert workshop conducted in Arabic, which included 25 Syrian mental health stakeholders, including psychologists, psychiatrists, public health, and policy professionals to identify priorities for research, programming and policy.
resultsOur review identified a total of 29 sources (15 peer-reviewed and 14 from the grey literature) on substance misuse and self-harm inside Syria. Overall, data on the prevalence of these conditions in Syria is limited, with significant gaps in quality, consistency, and geographic coverage. Workshop participants identified critical barriers to understanding the scale and scope of these conditions including stigma, lack of trained personnel, and insufficient integration of services. Recommendations included expanding telemental health services, adopting WHO mhGAP tools to increase capacity of staff in primary care settings, investing in long-term MHPSS programming, and scaling up family-skills training to prevent substance misuse and self-harm.
conclusionsThough current evidence gaps and shortfalls in funding around substance misuse and deliberate self-harm in Syria remain, this study highlights the urgent need to address substance misuse and self-harm in Syria through multi-level, culturally adapted interventions, as well as through comprehensive mental health system reform and policy. Prioritizing MHPSS within Syria's health reconstruction agenda, particularly for internally displaced and high-risk populations, is essential for long-term peacebuilding and recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.