ArticleBMC medical education2025
Assessing effectiveness of ABCDE Framework for teaching condylar fracture reduction in dental education: a mixed methods study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundManaging displaced proximal segments in mandibular condylar fractures remains challenging due to complex anatomy and limited surgical visibility. Conventional teaching methods in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) often inadequately address these challenges. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a novel ABCDE educational framework, based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), in enhancing surgical training by improving procedural understanding, technical skill acquisition, and trainee confidence in managing these fractures.
methodsThe ABCDE framework includes Assessment, Briefing, Collaborative learning, Demonstration, and Evaluation phases. Participants were 39 dental residents (Grades 1-3) enrolled in a 4-month OMFS rotation as part of their clinical residency program. Due to staggered rotation schedules, not all participants had participated in surgical rotations for condylar fracture reduction by the time of the study. All participants completed a two-day training program combining lectures and hands-on sessions. A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was used: quantitative assessments via pre- and post-intervention tests; qualitative analysis of open-ended questionnaires via thematic coding. Statistical analyses were conducted in RStudio using R software.
resultsThirty-six participants completed pre- and post-intervention tests and questionnaires, while three did not participate in assessments. Quantitative assessments were conducted using pre- and post-intervention tests, while qualitative analysis was performed on open-ended questionnaires using thematic coding techniques. Following the intervention, students' test scores demonstrated a significant improvement (median 25.00 [95% confidence interval (CI): 23.75, 30.00] to median 30.00 [95% CI: 25.00, 35.00], p < 0.01). Over 70% of residents reported positive satisfaction and learning gains, with correspondence analysis confirming strong associations between these outcomes. The Net Promoter Score (NPS) for the ABCDE framework was 44.44, indicating moderate-to-high advocacy. Qualitative insights emphasized its practicability, ease of use, and ability to boost engagement and skill acquisition.
conclusionsThe ABCDE framework bridges theoretical knowledge and hands-on practice, addressing anatomical and technical challenges in teaching mandibular condylar fracture management. Its TAM-driven modular design prioritizes perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, addressing conventional teaching limitations. Resident feedback emphasized increased satisfaction and advocacy, underscoring the value of interactive, teamwork-focused strategies in medical training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.