ArticleBMC plant biology2025
Intensifying heat stress impacts cotton flowering and boll development efficiency.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating molecular networks and physiological adaptation for heat-resilient crops.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026Review
- Speed breeding in upland cotton (Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Impacts of varying day and night environmental conditions on cotton flowering, yield, and fiber quality.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cotton-growing regions face heat stress during flowering and boll development, adversely affecting reproductive fitness, yield, and quality. Identifying and incorporating superior physiological and reproductive traits into elite genetic background may improve yield potential under stress. This study quantified the effects of heat stress (36/24 °C, HS) on 25 traits of 16 upland cotton cultivars during the reproductive stage, compared to control conditions (32/24 °C, CNT). Under HS, all cultivars exhibited transpirational cooling, with stomatal conductance increasing by 1-fold and transpiration by 1.6-fold compared to CNT. Under HS, leaf temperature was 3.5 °C higher than CNT plants, and PSII quantum efficiency dropped by 20% compared to CNT. HS also reduced the ratio of reproductive to vegetative dry mass (57%), indicating poor resource partitioning towards reproductive organs. The specific leaf area was increased by 34%, whereas the leaf chlorophyll index dropped by 28% under HS compared with CNT. When exposed to HS, pollen germination was reduced by 71% across cultivars compared to the CNT. While some cultivars maintained similar boll and seed numbers between CNT and HS, a corresponding tolerance was not observed in seed cotton yield. On average, seed cotton yield and lint yield decreased by 19% and 26% under HS, respectively. In contrast, seed yield remained stable, suggesting a disproportionate reduction in intra-boll components. Seed oil content and fiber quality, except for fiber uniformity, displayed susceptibility to HS. Multidimensional responses of cotton cultivars to HS highlight the need to map genetic loci governing heat tolerance. This knowledge is essential for pinpointing effective breeding targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.