ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2025
Inferior versus medial approach in laparoscopic and robotic surgery with complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer: propensity score-matched analysis.
Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRight-sided colon cancer surgery is a highly difficult operation, and ensuring perioperative safety is an important issue. While various approaches have been proposed for right-sided colon cancer, there are few reports comparing them. The present study compared the inferior approach (IA) and medial approach (MA) for right-sided colon cancer surgery and evaluated their safety.
methodsWe compared 528 cases of right-sided colon cancer surgery performed at our five affiliated institutions from 2017 to 2023, divided into IA and MA groups of 122 cases each using propensity score matching. Short-term outcomes of both groups were retrospectively evaluated, focusing on perioperative complications and perioperative mortality as the primary outcomes.
resultsAfter propensity score matching, all baseline variables were well balanced. All patients underwent complete mesocolic excision. No statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) was observed between the two groups in the incidence of postoperative complications, and no cases of severe complications were observed in either group. The incidence rates of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3 complications (IA/ MA): anastomotic leakage (0%/ 0.8%); intraabdominal abscess (0.8%/ 1.6%); surgical site infection (0.8%/ 3.2%); ileus (0%/ 0.8%); and anastomotic bleeding: (0%/ 0%). Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the IA group. Although there was a significant difference in the number of dissected lymph nodes, both groups had good R0 resection rates.
conclusionsBoth IA and MA represent safe and feasible approaches for right-sided colon cancer and can be selected on the basis of the surgeon's preference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.