ArticleScientific reports2025
Improving rainfall forecasting using deep learning data fusing model approach for observed and climate change data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate rainfall forecasting is vital for managing water resources, preventing floods, supporting agricultural activities, and enhancing disaster preparedness. Traditional forecasting methods, such as linear regression, autoregressive models, and time-series analysis, are limited in their ability to capture the intricate and dynamic nature of rainfall patterns. To address these shortcomings, this study utilizes a fusion of observed rainfall data and climate change projections to improve the precision of rainfall predictions over daily, 3-day, and weekly intervals. The performance of several advanced machine learning models was assessed, with the Efficient Linear Support Vector Machine (ELSVM) showing the highest accuracy in daily rainfall forecasting, yielding an R² value of 0.3868, indicating its ability to effectively capture the variability in rainfall. For the 3-day forecasting interval, Exponential Gaussian Process Regression (Exponential GPR) marginally outperformed Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), with Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Squared Error (MSE), and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) values of 15.84, 547.04, and 23.39, respectively. On the other hand, LSTM demonstrated higher error rates, with MAE, MSE, and RMSE values of 14.07, 363.03, and 19.05, respectively, and an R² value of 0.1662 for weekly forecasts. These findings underscore the significant potential of combining advanced machine learning models with data fusion techniques to enhance the accuracy and reliability of rainfall predictions, offering meaningful contributions to water resource management, climate adaptation, and the development of more robust forecasting systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.