ArticleHeredity2025
Exploring evolutionary mechanisms of genomic divergence in marine intertidal limpets.
Article in Heredity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Decades of research in population genetics have revealed that genetic divergence between populations and species is not uniformly distributed throughout the genome but rather exhibits a high degree of heterogeneity. Two main conceptual models-allopatric divergence and divergence with gene flow-have been proposed to explain this variability under natural selection. Here, we investigate patterns of genomic divergence in three marine limpet species, Scurria scurra, Scurria araucana, and Scurria ceciliana, across two major biogeographic breaks (30-34°S and 41-43°S). Genomic divergence varied among species, even between the two sympatric species S. scurra and S. araucana, which exhibited heterogeneous divergence patterns across the 30-34°S range. In S. ceciliana, the southernmost species (41-43°S), divergence was shaped by a combination of allopatric divergence and divergence with gene flow. This was unexpected given that its evolutionary history suggests past isolation in glacial refugia, which would have limited gene flow. However, the observed genomic divergence indicates that genetic exchange occurred between populations, challenging previous assumptions about its evolutionary dynamics. Divergence patterns appear species-specific, with few shared genomic regions, though more similarities were found among the sister species S. scurra and S. araucana. In highly divergent regions, genes associated with lipid metabolism were identified in S. scurra and S. araucana, whereas genes related to oxidative stress response and mitochondrial functions were found in S. ceciliana. These findings suggest that genomic divergence is not entirely stochastic but may be shaped by different selective pressures in each species, potentially reflecting adaptation to distinct ecological conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.