ArticleScientific reports2025
Manual restricted kinematic alignment technique restores postoperative limb alignment in severe knee deformities.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Restricted kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty using augmented reality technology to maintain limb alignment within targeted boundaries.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Restricted kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (rKA-TKA) for severe deformity in the preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA) has gained considerable interest. However, the widespread adoption of rKA-TKA has been limited by its requirement for expensive equipment such as navigation and robotic surgery systems. In this study, we developed manual rKA-TKA with modified soft tissue-respecting technique and investigated its surgical effects on postoperative HKAA. To achieve this, we examined factors affecting postoperative HKAA. Subsequently, the safe zone-related cut-off values of preoperative HKAA were calculated using the receiver operating characteristic curve, and postoperative HKAA was predicted using a linear regression model (LRM) and generalized additive model (GAM). Preoperative HKAA was identified as a factor influencing postoperative HKAA. The cut-off values of preoperative HKAA were -14 and -15° when the safe zones were defined as ± 1-3 and ± 4-5°, respectively. The GAM was more accurate in predicting the postoperative HKAA than the LRM. Additionally, the GAM showed a potential of falling within ± 5° of the postoperative HKAA, even in patients with preoperative HKAA ≤ - 19°. These findings suggest that manual rKA-TKA can be effective even for patients with severe deformities, providing an accessible alternative to conventional TKA for surgeons at resource-limited institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.