ArticleScientific reports2025
Systematic data management for effective AI-driven decision support systems in robotic rehabilitation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applications of artificial intelligence in mechanical engineering for the field of upper limb exoskeletons.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Next-generation strategies for anterior cruciate ligament repair: constructing biointelligent ligament grafts integrating biomimetic design, immune modulation, and sensory feedback.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Reliability, validity, and usability of an 18-item immersive virtual reality action research arm test: a validation study in stroke survivors.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Robotic rehabilitation is becoming a standard in post-stroke physical rehabilitation, and these setups, often coupled with virtual exercises, collect a large and finely grained amount of data about patients' motor performance, in terms of kinematics and force interactions. Given the high resolution of data throughout the rehabilitation treatment, invaluable information is concealed, especially if oriented towards predictive systems and decision support systems. Nevertheless, a comprehensive understanding of how manipulating these datasets with machine-learning to produce such outputs is still missing. This study leverages comprehensive robotic-assisted rehabilitation data to systematically investigate clinical outcome predictions (FMA, ARAT and MI) and robot parameters suggestions based solely on kinematic and demographic data. Our method significantly outperforms conventional approaches on both tasks demonstrating the potential of systematic data handling in advancing rehabilitation practices. Moreover, under the explainable-AI policies, a focus on prediction power of variables and a clinical knowledge base of predicted outcome are provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.