ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning models based on routine blood and biochemical test data for diagnosis of neurological diseases.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting Iron Deficiencies Using Routine Complete Blood Cell Count Parameters: A Machine Learning Approach and Evaluation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Globally, nervous system diseases are the leading cause of disability-adjusted life-years and the second leading cause of mortality in the world. Traditional diagnostic methods for nervous system diseases are expensive. So this study aimed to construct machine learning models using the convenient blood routine and biochemical detection data for diagnosis of nervous system diseases. After the data preprocessing, 25,794 healthy people and 7518 nervous system disease patients with the blood routine and biochemical detection data were utilized for our study. We selected logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and deep neural network to construct models. Finally, the SHAP algorithm was used to interpret models. The nervous system disease prediction model constructed by XGBoost possessed the best performance (AUC: 0.9782). And the most models of distinguishing various nervous system diseases also had good performance, the model performance of distinguishing neuromyelitis optica from other nervous system diseases was the best (AUC: 0.9095). The model interpretation by SHAP algorithm indicated features from biochemical detection made major contributions to predicting nervous system disease. The present study constructed multiple models using 52 features from the blood routine and biochemical detection data for diagnosis of various nervous system diseases. Meanwhile, distinct hematologic features of various nervous system diseases also were explored. This cost-effective work will benefit more people and assist in diagnosis and prevention of nervous system diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.