ArticleScientific reports2025
Association between protein and energy intake during acute phase and sepsis outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between prognostic nutritional index and mortality in patients with sepsis-associated delirium: a retrospective cohort study using the MIMIC-IV database.BMC nutrition · 2026Article
- Article
- Hypothalamic regulation of sepsis-associated anorexia: cytokine and hormonal signalling through AgRP/POMC circuits.EMBO molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Nutritional Risk and 30-Day In-Hospital Mortality in Adults With Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Development and Internal Validation of a Nomogram Model to Predict Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis Occurrence Risk in ICU Patients with Sepsis.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the relationship between protein and energy intake during the early (days 1-2) and late (days 3-7) acute phase and prognosis in septic patients with nutritional risk screening 2002 ≥ 3. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with 28-day mortality. Among 293 shock patients, higher energy intake in days 3-7 was signifcantly associated with lower 28-day mortality (hazard ratio, 0.969; 95% confidence interval, 0.942-0.997; P = 0.033). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed achieving 75% of energy target in days 3-7 correlated with decreased 28-day mortality (P = 0.040). In 309 non-shock patients, no significant relationships between nutritional therapy during acute phase and 28-day mortality were observed. Enhanced energy intake in days 3-7 showed no correlation with improvements in length of intensive care unit/hospital stay, ventilator-free days, non-ICU survival days or hospitalization costs for septic patients. In shock patients, energy intake in days 3-7 demonstrated no relationship with secondary infections; however, among non-shock patients, achieving 50% of energy intake in days 3-7 was linked to lower incidence of fungus infections (P = 0.006) and intra-abdominal infections(P = 0.003). Our findings demonstrate statistical associations between augmenting energy intake during the late acute phase and potential benefits in sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.