ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025
Competing risk analysis of dexmedetomidine use and postoperative outcomes in non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage patients.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- DexSAH: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Dexmedetomidine in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDexmedetomidine is widely used in critically ill patients, but its effects on postoperative outcomes in non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients remain unclear. This study focuses on exploring the impact of dexmedetomidine on postoperative respiratory failure (RF) and in-hospital mortality.
methodsThe data were downloaded from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV) database, including 817 non-traumatic SAH patients. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. Multivariable logistic regression, sensitivity, interaction, and subgroup analyses were used to examine the association between dexmedetomidine use and RF or in-hospital mortality. A competing risk model was employed, with RF defined as the event of interest and in-hospital mortality as the competing event, to evaluate the survival probabilities for both outcomes.
resultsDexmedetomidine use was a risk factor for RF but a protective factor for in-hospital mortality both pre-/post-PSM (p < 0.05). The protective effect of dexmedetomidine on mortality was more pronounced in younger patients (≤ 62 years) and those without cerebrovascular disease. Competing risk analysis showed that even after adjusting for confounders, dexmedetomidine remained a significant protective factor for in-hospital mortality, but did not affect the incidence of RF.
conclusionsDexmedetomidine use in non-traumatic SAH patients significantly reduces in-hospital mortality but does not affect the incidence of postoperative RF. These findings highlight the importance of considering competing risks when evaluating the effects of dexmedetomidine on postoperative outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.