Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40739255›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025

The relationship between the anatomical location of the left lumbar segmental artery and the course of the contralateral (right) segmental artery in oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF): a cadaveric analysis.

Worawat Limthongkul, Peeradon Jaruprat, Maruay Tanayavong, Weerasak Singhatanadgige, Wicharn Yingsakmongkol, Vit Kotheeranurak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Worawat LimthongkulDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, 1873 Rama IV Rd, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Peeradon JarupratDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, 1873 Rama IV Rd, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Maruay TanayavongDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, 1873 Rama IV Rd, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Weerasak SinghatanadgigeDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, 1873 Rama IV Rd, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Wicharn YingsakmongkolDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, 1873 Rama IV Rd, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Vit KotheeranurakDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, 1873 Rama IV Rd, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand. orthochula@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designCadaveric anatomical analysis. PURPOSE AND OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE.: Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) is a minimally invasive surgical technique used to treat various lumbar spine pathologies, including spinal canal stenosis, degenerative scoliosis, and spondylolisthesis. While vascular injury to the approach (left) side is a recognized complication, there is an underappreciated risk of injury to the contralateral lumbar segmental arteries, particularly during discectomy and cage insertion. These vessels lie outside the direct OLIF surgical corridor and are thus at risk due to the "blind" nature of instrument manipulation. Understanding the trajectory of these contralateral arteries is essential for minimizing complications such as postoperative bleeding and psoas hematoma. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the anatomical relationships of lumbar segmental arteries bilaterally and identify reliable predictors of contralateral artery trajectory.

methodsA total of 30 intact cadaveric specimens were dissected to assess the anatomical course of both left and right lumbar segmental arteries. Measurements were taken at each lumbar level (L1-L5) to determine the distance between the arteries and defined landmarks along the intervertebral disc-from the most anterior to the most posterior border.

resultsThe analysis revealed a strong correlation between the positions of the left and right lumbar segmental arteries at certain levels. Notably, the anterior position of the left segmental artery demonstrated a high predictive value for the contralateral artery's location at L4 (R = 0.882) and L5 (R = 0.804). In contrast, correlations were weaker at other levels, particularly in the posterior regions of the disc.

conclusionThis cadaveric study suggests that identifying the anterior trajectory of the left segmental artery intraoperatively may serve as a reliable predictor for locating the contralateral artery, particularly at the L4 and L5 levels during OLIF procedures. if the left segmental artery is observed overlying the L4 and L5 vertebral bodies-rather than at the L3/4 or L4/5 intervertebral disc levels-surgeons can be reasonably assured that the corresponding right-sided arteries are also not positioned over the disc spaces. Nevertheless, the general surgical principle remains paramount: instrumentation should never extend beyond the contralateral intervertebral disc border, regardless of presumed vascular anatomy.

Indexed as

ArteriesLumbar VertebraeSpinal FusionAgedCadaverFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedLateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF)Lumbar segmental arteryMinimally invasive spine surgeryOblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF)Vascular complication

Identifiers

PMID40739255
PMCPMC12309209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.