Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40739221›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

A scoping review on HCV screening strategies: population to screen and the test types.

Saro Abdella Abrahim, Andrew Radley, Sarah K Inglis, Zelalem Kebede, Abeje Kebede, Getahun Fetensa, Andargachew Mulu, Wondwossen Amogne, Dawit Wolday, John Dillon

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Saro Abdella AbrahimHealth Laboratory Services, Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. helen_saro@yahoo.com.
Andrew RadleyMolecular and Clinical Medicine, Dundee University, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Sarah K InglisTayside Clinical Trials Unit, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Zelalem KebedeDepartment of Health Behavior & Society, School of graduate studies, Institute of Health Science, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Abeje KebedeHIV and TB Research Directorate, Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Getahun FetensaHIV and TB Research Directorate, Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Andargachew MuluViral Disease Research Division, Armauer Hansen Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Wondwossen AmogneDepartment of Internal Medicine & Infectious Diseases, Collage of health science, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Dawit WoldayHealth Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
John DillonMolecular and Clinical Medicine, Dundee University, Scotland, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHepatitis C virus (HCV) is a genetically diverse blood-borne pathogen causing liver inflammation and damage. It is one of the global public health problems responsible for claiming thousands of lives every year. Although there are various HCV testing strategies depending on the specific circumstances and guidance of local authorities, the proportion of diagnosed HCV cases in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) is estimated to be less than 5%. This review analyzes and documents evidence for different ways of screening HCV.

methodsThe updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines have been used as the basis for this scoping review. Retrieved articles were screened and extracted by three independent individuals to make sure that all pertinent literatures were included.

resultsA total of 8318 records were retrieved from four electronic databases (Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL and Google Scholar). Of the total retrieved records and after applying the pre-defined inclusion criteria, we included 51 studies in this review. According to the studies included in this review, three major screening approaches were noted: The universal, targeted, and risk-based HCV screening strategies. Population to screen include the baby boomer cohort, pregnant women, key populations, those experiencing homelessness, adults visiting health facilities, employees, and social event attendants. A "one-stop-shop" HCV testing initiative at different settings, such as prisons, addiction rehabilitation centers, and community dropping centers, were found to increase HCV test uptake among key populations. Integrating HCV screening with the existing HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) clinics was highlighted to identifying and linking HCV-infected individuals to appropriate care and treatment. Although there are many ways of diagnosing HCV for treatment, identifying those who were reactive for HCV antibody first, followed by an HCV-antigen test for those antibody-positive, were found to be the most cost-efficient way of diagnosing HCV infection.

conclusionHCV screening among pregnant women, the baby boomer cohort, adults visiting health facilities, engaging in injection drug use, incarcerated individuals, and those experiencing homelessness are useful approaches in identifying HCV-antibody positive individuals. An efficient way to reach the most at-risk people is to incorporate HCV screening into community service centers and clinics.

Indexed as

Hepatitis CMass ScreeningFemaleHumansMalePregnancyDiagnosisHCVHepatitisScreeningTest

Identifiers

PMID40739221
PMCPMC12309219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.