ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2025
Current state of medication treatment practice for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction among cardiologists in Japan: a survey on the relationship between satisfaction levels and adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe number of patients with heart failure is steadily increasing in parallel with the aging of the population in Japan. This study aimed to assess the level of satisfaction with the latest treatments, identify the factors influencing satisfaction, and investigate the current guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) practice for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) among cardiologists in Japan.
methodsRespondents were categorised into two groups based on their level of satisfaction with the current treatment for HFrEF. Those who responded "(1) Not satisfied," "(2) Somewhat dissatisfied," or "(3) Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied" encompassed the dissatisfied group. Conversely, those who responded "(4) Somewhat satisfied" or "(5) Satisfied" comprised the satisfied group.
resultsA total of 203 valid responses were collected from cardiologists in Japan in a survey conducted between December 27, 2023, and January 30, 2024. These respondents were divided into two groups based on their satisfaction with the current HFrEF treatment: those who were dissatisfied (n = 92) and those who were satisfied (n = 111). The demographics of the respondents in the two groups revealed no differences. However, the dissatisfied group reported a significantly higher proportion of patients under their care who were considered refractory to treatment than the satisfied group (p = 0.015). Although the dissatisfied group was more likely to indicate that patients' heart failure (HF) underlying characteristics influenced their treatment more (4.15 vs. 3.90, p = 0.045), the satisfied group was significantly more likely to indicate that domestic (4.38 vs. 4.13, p = 0.021) and international (3.85 vs. 3.60, p = 0.039) guidelines influenced their HF treatment practices. Sodium-glucose transport protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor prescription related to increased satisfaction (odds ratio, 2.199; 95% confidence interval, 1.102-4.392; p = 0.025).
conclusionApproximately 50% of the respondents were dissatisfied with the current pharmacological treatment of patients with chronic HFrEF, suggesting that SGLT2 inhibitors were prescribed less frequently and that patient management tended to be guided more by individual symptoms and underlying HF characteristics rather than strict adherence to GDMT. The use of SGLT2 inhibitors was significantly associated with higher treatment satisfaction, particularly among physicians who adhered more closely to current GDMT recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.